Safe enough to try?
Tuesday
13th of November 2018
Again,
I woke up at 4 o’ clock in the morning and finished some open tasks in my role
as “Crunching Master”, by that occasion. “Crunching Master” is a role we defined
in our circle “Data Mavericks” and has the purpose “to make our customers happy”
with accountabilities like “leading the Data Crunching Workshops with a
customer” or “prioritizing and implementing the customer project specific
backlog.
With
holacracy the powershift, away from one manager to roles, crafted in the team by
the members of the team, is the main goal but also the biggest challenge! Especially people who were in a manager role, have to rethink how they act and
how they empower the people energizing roles in the circle. And you know what?
The same happened to me! I had to totally restructure the way I discuss and bring myself in, how I communicate with my team-members.
It is a huge shift from having ideas and believing to know how it should be and
bringing those ideas into the system, versus to hold back and let the system act
and change based on tensions of the members in their roles. And on the other hand it is a huge shift of the mindset for team-members, how to contribute and get the sense for their tensions!
And
it is worth the time and patience to hold back to let people mention their tension
and act self-driven according their roles and accountabilities. People will be
able to act more autonomous and therefore self-managed!
And at this point the big question and challenge as a coach is, how can I support the people to
mention their tension!? How can I make them feel, that it is safe enough, to do
something, make steps forward and getting things done. And therefore continuously
improve and change the system according to the current activities!
Today
I had this conclusion, that we need to be very consequent in implementing
holacracy in the system to gain the full power out of it. To start to ignite the
new level and to achieve, that every member of the circles fully acts in their
roles accountability, self-driven and at a maximum level of motivation to take
part to improve and further develop the organization itself.
And
even though it takes time to get reach a high maturity on processing tensions
and collaborating according to holacracy principles, it is still much more
valuable, agile and also fun and motivating for the people contributing, than a
classical hierarchy system can be.
“Safe
enough to try” is a very powerful and motivating attitude to coach people and
give them the feeling that they are right and that a step into the right
direction will bring them forward, even though it might be not 100%, but better
than do nothing and wait for someone’s advice.
By
the way –A “Circle” is a Role that may further break itself down by defining
its own contained Roles to achieve its Purpose, control its Domains, and enact
its Accountabilities. The Roles a Circle defines are its “Defined Roles”, and
anyone filling one of its Defined Roles is a “Circle Member” of that Circle (holacracy
constitution chapter 2.1).
I have discovered the following wall paintings by coincident on my walk to the training location, when I crossed a nice little street in the middle of the city and between all these large streets.
Well indeed it sounds great. Perhaps quite a lot of effort to keep the team focused over a longer time, but having people in a circle who really want to learn it, then it may work just fine. But what happens if some people just do not want to contribute? Or they think it was better, when they didn't had to contribute to shape the organization all the time? Or here is actual case from one of the companies here. Because americans have only 10 days for vacation or sickness, they just don't report the vactation days, or whenever they are sick, they say they will do homeoffice to protect all the others - and not much is getting done. How do you cope with this "real world" cases? - This is just to keep you on the ground Martin - but have fun!
ReplyDeleteHey Matthias
DeleteI know exactly what you mean.
First of all it is important to know, that no one has an obligation to participate in shaping the organization. But in contrast to a hierarchy approach you can! Which is great if you like to contribute in one's company success! But again, no body has to. I actually collaborate since 2 years in that format, even-though I had a manager role before, I prefer to work that way now. It is much more motivating and even faster, when the system runs. Now my ideas and proposal get immediately better, by integrating also the perspective of others.
And there will be others, who prefer the conventional way, which is very much ok!
Holacracy will also not solve these issues being sick to fake the system. But as an affect it might lead to other solutions, better solutions, designed by the whole team. Think about how great that is..